Lesson
Planning for Leaders
By Dr. Ryan Donlan
Assistant Professor
Department of Educational
Leadership
Bayh College of Education
Indiana State University
A few mornings ago, I noticed my wife’s
lesson-planning book sitting atop the table in our breakfast nook. She uses it at the Indiana State University
Early Childhood Education Center. I smiled
nostalgically as I remembered the last time I used one about 20 years ago as a
classroom teacher, then thought, Why
didn’t I ever use one as principal or superintendent?
Pondering how leaders could begin with the end in mind, as Covey (1989)
reminded us from those highly effective, I thought of how a school principal
might take the Standards and Standard Elements of the Educational Leadership
Constituent Council (ELCC) and work backward toward ensuring “coverage” of each
during his or her leadership in any given school year.
Turning my mind a bit further, I imagined
how vertical articulation of leadership content could be delivered as a school’s
organizational culture progresses developmentally through any planned program
of a leader’s tenure. A leadership
curriculum, it would be.
I then I thought: Is our leadership
Standards-based? Do we use backwards
design? Do we even have a curriculum or
lesson planning, per say?
Said other ways …
Do we move from the outcomes we desire, through next the framework upon which our decisions are suspended, and finally to
the actions we take to reach those
outcomes?
Do we perform gap analyses or use pacing
guides, even figuratively?
Do we evaluate the intentionality of our
leadership with respect to scope and sequence of what others can handle in
followership?
Or … do we simply go to work and deal
with urgencies?
I then wanted to examine the logic of my thinking,
so in order to evaluate commonalities in teaching and leadership, I pulled from
Domain 1 of Dr. Robert Marzano’s Art and Science of Teaching Framework’s Learning Map (2011, 2010). I noticed quite-the overlap.
Take for instance the Design Questions
from Domain 1, “Classroom Strategies and Behaviors”:
Design
Question 1: What will I do to establish
and communication learning goals, track student progress, and celebrate
success?
Design
Question 2: What will I do to help students effectively interact with new
knowledge?
Design
Question 3: What will I do to help
students practice and deepen their understanding of new knowledge?
Design
Question 4: What will I do to help
students generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge?
Design
Question 5: What will I do to engage students?
Design
Question 6: What will I do to establish
and maintain classroom rules and procedures?
Design
Question 7: What will I do to recognize
and acknowledge adherence and lack of adherence to classroom rules and
procedures?
Design
Question 8: What will I do to establish and maintain effective relationships
with students?
Design
Question 9: What will I do to communicate high expectations for all students? (Marzano, 2011, 2010)
Consider a quick substitution of “staff”
for “students” and “school” for “classroom,” in each question above. Our better leaders ask these questions of
themselves.
So how does lesson planning for leaders fit
in? As important, What’s left out of
leadership if lesson planning is absent? My guess is that it would be prudent
forethought … as well as depth.
Broadening the panorama, I will go so far
as to suggest that a bonafide leadership curriculum
is necessary to help any principal span the gamut between professional standards as written and daily actions as required?
Who would write such a curriculum?
Superintendents?
Leadership Teams?
Boards of Education?
College Professors?
Politicians?
Let’s measure twice before we cut once on
that one.
I have often suggested to K-12 leaders
that we take time to THINK each day.
Would this “thinking,” let’s say with a lesson plan book in our Sunday armchairs,
help us better to craft what we do to move a school forward?
In conferring
with colleague Dr. Steve Gruenert on the need for lesson planning in leadership,
he extended my thoughts as he typically does, noting, “Pastors use bibles,
coaches use playbooks, the military uses the most current intelligence, parents
go by intuition. Perhaps educators ought to use all four.”
Dr. Gruenert
also noted that leaders might best separate the leadership curriculum guide from the to-do
list, as oftentimes, our to-do list
becomes mistaken for the playbook. He’s got a point.
I wonder how it would be received if I
asked principals enrolled in my graduate classes to purchase lesson-planning
books as part of their required course materials.
Might be a learned experience, putting
them to good use.
References
Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people. New York, NY: Free Press.
Marzano, R. (2011). Marzano art and science of teaching framework learning map.
LearningSciencesInternational Learning and Performance Management. Retrieved at http://education.ucf.edu/rtp3/docs/RTP_Marzano_Art%20_Science_of_Teaching_Framework.pdf
Marzano, R. (2010). An observational protocol based on “the art and science of teaching”.
Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratory.
_____________________________________________________________________
Dr.
Ryan Donlan would love to hear your thoughts, opinions, feelings, reactions,
reflections, and intended actions regarding lesson planning in leadership. Please feel free to contact him at anytime at
(812) 237-8624 or at ryan.donlan@indstate.edu.
I use a planbook! We have standards...do you remember the domains? I even completed a RISE portfolio last year. I feel like that is our planbook. Enjoyed the article! People (urgencies) by day...paper by night...
ReplyDelete