The
Principalship
Just How
Hard Could It Be?
By Adam Bussard
Superintendent
Brownstown CUSD #201
Doctoral Student
Indiana State University
&
Ryan Donlan
Assistant Professor
Department of Educational Leadership
Bayh College of Education
Indiana State University
The
duties for building principals are endless, as it seems that the current
perspective in K-12 education is that principals must shoulder quite the
burden, indeed. Responsibilities such as psychometric compliance to ever-moving
standardized testing targets are adding substantial time, work, and stress on
some of our greatest leaders.
Don’t get us
wrong, some of the accountability pieces put in place the last several years
are good and help principals ensure through the evaluation and supervision of
their teaching staffs the best possible education for students. The question is
though, “Is it fair to our principals to expect that they need to assume ALL responsibilities
as instructional leaders along with responsibilities of running a building and
tending to the needs of a community?
As Fullan (as
cited in in Pepper, 2010) stated, “Never before has a school principal’s job
been more important and never before has the job been more difficult. Today’s
school leaders are caught between current expectations of improving test
results and expectations of the past in which the principal’s job was to see
that the school ran smoothly and the principal was responsive to students, parents,
and other stakeholders” (p. 43).
Data show that
school leadership can have an effect on teacher and student performance, yet
much of this is reliant upon positive and proactive strategies in management in providing support
systems that will enable all to maintain high quality job performance. Middle
management is not a profane term.
Yet in recent
years it has become unfashionable.
We wonder how
often district level administration and boards of education are educated on the
daunting managerial tasks necessary for organizational success that are being
demanded of building principals each day – those that have little to do with
teaching evaluation or curricular leadership. To use a medical metaphor, someone must
prepare the operating rooms for surgery and keep appropriate socio-emotional supports
for those getting treated and their loved ones.
We would like to
suggest a redoubled focus on transparency in preparation for careers in K-12
school building leadership. At minimum,
every program should have a vibrant practicum or Internship where preservice
principals are provided experiences in managing myriad demands as they are
asked to lead. This would certainly go a
long way toward allowing future principals 20/20 perspectives regarding the
expectations that will be demanded of them when they accept their first positions.
Applied
experiences of graduate school learning in real-world, unpredictable situations
would also demonstrate what is ever-so-special about the careers of K-12
principals as well. After all, no other
position in education today has the possibility of enhancing (and even
“saving”) so many lives entrusted to its care. These opportunities to make a
difference take place amidst challenges that are occurring for stakeholders in
our states and local communities, where real lives are being both positively
and negatively affected by the economy and world events.
Take for
instances the brutal reality that most districts are strapped for cash and are spending
down their reserves because of the devastation of school funding in Illinois,
as one example. Legislators are encouraging districts to do more with fewer
resources. In the midst of all this, principals
must serve as champions of “Can DO!” while fostering willingness in others to
help one’s neighbors, friends, and colleagues, as a bright future is oftentimes
out of our reach individually, yet not so collectively.
Just consider how
difficult it is today for principals to implement some the newer mandates that
are taking substantial amounts of time implementing include transitioning to
the Common Core State Standards or implementing revised performance evaluation
systems. Superhuman leadership is what
today’s principalship is all about, including helping those as one example, who
are threatened by the direction K-12 education is heading. It’s not what many signed-up for 20 years ago.
In this, a strong rapport with faculty
and staff is critical, as for buy-in to occur, all must trust that the
principal is a caretaker.
Yes, the principalship
is interpersonal; however, is simultaneously technical and pedagogical. For newbies, it is certainly
“educational.”
One bit of advice
we would be remiss if we did not mention to those considering a K-12 building
principal’s career is that at all times, one’s professional position will be intimately
political. This requires a new way of thinking, in that in order to implement
needed changes, one may need to first become an armchair political
scientist. Possibly a park bench’s
anthropologist as well, of school culture, that is.
All too often, leaders
who encounter the most resistance to change fail to step back, look, ponder,
and beyond this … to “think,” and thus, become more concerned with how events
affect them personally, as opposed to the naturally expected influences of
politics and culture. Without a more panoramic perspective, principals can
quickly lose any social capital they may have amassed if change through
initiative isn’t accompanied by interpersonal resilience, political tact, and
with-it-ness.
With-it-ness is
the ability to see oneself as others are seeing.
These three
qualities of resilience, tact, and with-it-ness involve FIRST taking care of
ourselves. Although our hardwiring is to care-take for others and even though we
are responsible for all that goes wrong under our watch, we must control the
manner in which we deal with the stresses that arise throughout a school year
and foster a certain degree of resilience for the baggage we’re most certain to
accrue, personally.
Living a healthy
life outside of school – the life of a husband, wife, partner, friend, dad, or
mom – is part of the pre-service education we must share with transparency and
without apology. Otherwise, we haven’t
provided the visualization necessary that will allow in graduating principals, lasting
success.
References
Chappelear, T. C., & Price, T.
(2012). Teachers’ perceptions of high school principal’s monitoring of student
progress and the relationship to student achievement. NCPEA Publications, 1(6), 1-16.
Pepper, K. (2012). Effective principals
skillfully balance leadership styles to facilitate student success: A focus for
the reauthorization of ESEA. Planning and
Changing, 41(1/2), 42-56.
_______________________________________________________
Adam
Bussard and Ryan Donlan are incredibly excited about the quality of preservice
principal candidates selecting pathways to building leadership on behalf of
schools and communities across the Midwest and America. If you would like to have additional
conversations with them, please consider reaching-out at bussardprin@gmail.com
and ryan.donlan@indstate.edu.
Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck ! Faculty Development Program || Institution Building || Educational Leadership
ReplyDelete