The Indiana A-F
School Grading System: Does It Really Demonstrate Accountability?
By Dr. Terry McDaniel
Associate Professor
Department of Educational Leadership
Bayh College of Education
Indiana State University
What does the letter grade of “A” mean to you? Does it mean
excellence? Does it mean outstanding work well above the average expectation?
One educational “fad” being promoted by many states, including Indiana is to
grade schools and school districts by letter grades. According to the Indiana
Department of Education website regarding the A-F school grading system, “Indiana’s A through F
grading system gives parents, students, educators and communities a clear and
concise assessment of how well their schools are doing. This system is a new
and better way of measuring and reporting school performance each year, as
required by state law.” But is it really providing a “clear and concise
assessment”?
The recent scandal of the change of
a school’s letter grade by Former Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony
Bennett has left many doubting if the letter grades are even an accurate
measure of schools as was originally intended. This has tarnished an already-criticized
system. Schools are left wondering if their scores are justified.
Additionally many school leaders
will tell you the accountability formula had many issues that seemed to grade
schools unfairly. High-performing schools could “lose” a letter grade if they
simply maintained their high achievement, for the formula has a growth
component, which affects the final grade. The formula was also built on a point
system that rounded totals in certain areas that could affect a final outcome.
What about primary grades one and two which are not tested, but dependent only
on grade three for growth?
But even with these issues, the
issue of accountability is sound. Schools need to be accountable. Yet, the true
problem with the A-F grading system is simply,” What does an “A” or any letter
grade mean?”
Do you know how the
letter grade is formulated for your school?
An informal poll will demonstrate that practically no parents can tell
you the formula. Very few teachers and administrators can explain the formula.
Legislators are very unlikely to be able to explain the details of the
formula. So how can anyone really know
what a school’s letter grade means?
Presently a study group is trying to
revise the A-F grading system. But when something does not work, sometimes it
is best to get rid of it. Throw away the A-F grading system for schools. This
system tells the public absolutely nothing. It is flawed and antiquated. If you
want to have an accountability system, stop making it so complicated that no
one knows what it means. Make it simple.
How about this?
Develop a Four Star system for accountability.
1.
Set
a standard of at least 90% of all students in a school passing Language arts
assessments. This will be End-of-Course Assessments for highs schools and the
ISTEP+ for middle and elementary schools. If a school reaches this standard,
the school receives a star.
2.
Set
a standard of at least 90% of all students in a school passing math
assessments. This will be End-of-Course Assessments for highs schools and the
ISTEP+ for middle and elementary schools. If a school reaches this standard,
the school receives a star.
3.
For
high schools set a standard of at least 90% graduation rate based on a five–year
window. (The four-year graduation rate punishes students who may need extra
time for reasons beyond their control. Besides are we so intent on a four –year
graduation of students or do we really want student to graduate even if it
takes an extra year?) If a school reaches this standard, the school receives a
star.
4.
For
elementary and middle schools set an attendance rate of 97% school average for
the academic year. (A 97% rate takes in account childhood illnesses and not
pushing “sick” kids to come to school to affect others with their illness.) If
a school reaches this standard, the school receives a star.
5.
If
a school meets all criteria, they receive a four-star designation.
6.
Each
school, for accountability with the public, will do the following:
a.
Post
the school’s total language arts grades for each grade level and overall for
the school.
b.
Post
last year’s same scores for all categories.
c.
Post
scores of state averages so the public can see how their schools measure
compared to the state averages in each category.
d.
Ensure
that the same would be done at the district level.
School
Name
|
This
Year’s Percentage
|
Last
year’s Percentage
|
Stave
Average
|
Percent
of Students Passing Language Arts
|
|||
Percent
of Students Passing Mathematics
|
|||
Elementary
and Middle Schools Attendance Rate
|
|||
High
School Graduation Rates
|
It is simple, to the point, and easy to read. While critics
and supporters may want to make adjustments to cover other areas, such as
career readiness in high schools, certain adjustments could still keep a model
that is understandable and would give the public a clear account of schools’
achievement levels. It is a standards-based model that simply provides a goal
for schools.
_________________________________________________________________
Dr. Terry McDaniel has spent more than 30 years as a
champion for public education in the State of Indiana. Please be encouraged to contact Dr. McDaniel
at Indiana State University at terry.mcdaniel@indstate.edu. There is no better
friend to leadership!
No comments:
Post a Comment